Alexis de tocqueville, a young french aristocrat, came to the young nation to investigate the functioning of american democracy and the social, political, and economic life of its citizens, publishing his observations in 1835 and 1840. One hears constantly reiterated the concept, majority rule and minority rights, (foremost, apparently, being the right to follow the dictates of the majority) majority rule has the approval of the majority, and it seems no more need be said.
Democracy requires minority rights as much as it does majority rule that means the minority’s rights must be protected, no matter what if the majority could wield its power without restrictions, it could easily tyrannize the minority.
In other words, the danger of democratic despotism is not the abuse of majority rule but the effective end of majority rule according to tocqueville, this danger emerges in a way that will be surprising to us most americans, and especially most conservatives, think of individualism as opposed to despotism. In this section he looks at the power, whether for good or bad, of majority rule there are both strengths and weaknesses to letting the majority decide political questions tocqueville doesn’t try to pre-judge whether it’s better to have a democracy or a king.
The famous commentator on american democracy, alexis de tocqueville, talked a great deal in his books democracy in america about the tyranny of the majority this is when majority rule–the basis of democracy–ends up perverting democracy by forcing injustice on the minority of the public. In “toqueville on the problems of democracy”, tocqueville argues that democracy is a form of government that claims to empower the people, but in which despotism is inherent through the unrestrained power seemingly granted to the majority he argues that democracy is the ‘tyranny of the majority’, which maintains despotism in the administrative sphere while the citizens become subservient in between elections. Tocqueville is concerned about the danger of mob rule and argues that the potential for tyranny still exists under democracy tocqueville then addresses the form of despotism, other than that of majority, which is to be feared in democratic nations. Tocqueville warned that modern democracy may be adept at inventing new forms of tyranny, because radical equality could lead to the materialism of an expanding bourgeoisie and to the selfishness of individualism.
As tocqueville realized in his diagnosis of the democratic malady, the question of the individual and majority rule cannot be separated from the more pertinent subject of the individual and the state. The injustice of democracy: tocqueville on american majority rule pages 3 words 947 view full essay more essays like this: not sure what i'd do without @kibin - alfredo alvarez, student @ miami university exactly what i needed - jenna kraig, student @ ucla wow most helpful essay resource ever. In practice, democracy is governed by its most popularly understood principle: majority rule namely, when something is voted on, the side with the most votes wins, whether it is an election, a legislative bill, a union-management agreement, or a shareholder motion in a corporation. Tocqueville saw the american federal system as providing the advantage of a small nation that best fosters freedom and democracy, and the advantage of a larger country that brings greater prosperity, opportunity, and contributions to civilization.
Christianity and the origins of american democracy tocqueville opens democracy in the abuse of majority rule but the council of academic advisors at the heritage foundation. Majority rule, minority rights, majority tyranny the fear of “majority tyranny” was a common theme in the 17th century and later, even among those who were sympathetic to democracy given the opportunity, it was argued, a majority would surely trample on the fundamental rights of minorities.